From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com
Cc: hch@infradead.org, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/11] lpfc 8.1.1 : Fixes to error handlers
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:11:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <438BFF2E.20407@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BB4DECD4CFE6D43AA8EA8D768ED51C21D7B76@xbl3.emulex.com>
James.Smart@Emulex.Com wrote:
>>So you this storage vendor please provide us this test case
>>as a start?
>
>
> Basic test case:
> - start load on the fc disks
> - run sg_reset -b /dev/sgX or sg_reset -d /dev/sgX
>
>
>>That beeing said I mentioned that we need to do SG-based
>>resets via the
>>EH thread aswell. As Emulex apparently cares about the above
>>case would
>>you mind implementing it?
>
>
> Well - we would prefer the vendor test the system as it should behave
> in normal circumstances rather than test-suite-derived conditions.
>
> Yes, we will sign up for this. However, we have several items on our
> plate so we won't be on this quickly. I would hope there would be no
> issue with accepting the patch as is and backing out the relatived code
> as part of the eventual patch. We'll also be contacting the SG maintainer
> to get his/her thoughts.
While on the subject of resets, linux still has a
fuzziness around a "device" reset. There should be
two resets around this level:
- target reset: reset a target device, its ports and
all logical units within it [transport level]
- logical unit reset: reset a logical unit only
[this is a mandatory SCSI task management function]
If changes are being made in this area, then perhaps
this fuzziness should be addressed.
Doug Gilbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-29 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-28 21:16 [PATCH 6/11] lpfc 8.1.1 : Fixes to error handlers James.Smart
2005-11-29 7:11 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2005-11-30 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-30 19:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-01 15:37 James.Smart
2005-11-28 19:08 James.Smart
2005-11-28 19:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-28 16:42 James.Smart
2005-11-28 19:02 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=438BFF2E.20407@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.