From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] CTA_PROTO_NUM is u_int8_t not u_int16_t (was Re: CTA_PROTO_NUM u_int8_t or u_int16_t) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:07:49 +0100 Message-ID: <438CDF45.9040308@trash.net> References: <20051124200736.GW31478@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20051124202125.GX31478@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <43864DC7.6060109@trash.net> <20051125084427.GL31478@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <438710E1.2000202@trash.net> <4387A946.3000005@eurodev.net> <20051129040925.GC3544@rama.towersoft.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20051129040925.GC3544@rama.towersoft.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte wrote: > No, I oppose any kind of kernel version number checking. I'd rather > break 2.6.14 with new versions of the userspace. > The stable tree has a couple of patches pending, so I guess there will be another release. I'll ask them if they would take a patch to fix this issue.