From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Farkas Levente Subject: Re: automount never umount Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:31:20 +0100 Message-ID: <438EC2E8.6060602@bppiac.hu> References: <4381E865.4070908@bppiac.hu> <4382E835.3020904@bppiac.hu> <438344F7.8020503@bppiac.hu> <17283.19512.49399.338448@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <43838CA9.40105@bppiac.hu> <17283.46783.748916.772469@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <438435EF.6080102@bppiac.hu> <43846C1C.3050305@bppiac.hu> <17284.35467.301318.255602@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <17284.40834.559604.943290@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <4384A354.9040502@bppiac.hu> <17284.41971.660257.356263@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <43859055.3020508@bppiac.hu> <17291.9542.484484.306141@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <438C4983.30504@bppiac.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <438C4983.30504@bppiac.hu> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: jmoyer@redhat.com Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org, Ian Kent Farkas Levente wrote: > Jeff Moyer wrote: >>Sure, you could enable debug. I just didn't want to get too much >>information. However, at this point, it's probably better that we get as >>much as possible so Farkas doesn't have to keep trying new patches. >> >>Farkas, please look at the output of dmesg and let us know what you find. >>You should see something like this: > > > # dmesg |sort|uniq > > autofs4_revalidate: revalidate called on behalf of application "automount" > autofs4_revalidate: revalidate called on behalf of application > "multiload-apple" > > so what can i do? no longer use multiload-applet ? this is a standard > gnome applet included in fc4: "System Monitor 2.10.1" so what is the conclusion now? will autofs be modified to umount even in such case or ...? thnaks. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"