From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] CTA_PROTO_NUM is u_int8_t not u_int16_t (was Re: CTA_PROTO_NUM u_int8_t or u_int16_t) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 04:31:27 +0100 Message-ID: <4392630F.4040008@eurodev.net> References: <20051124200736.GW31478@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20051124202125.GX31478@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <43864DC7.6060109@trash.net> <20051125084427.GL31478@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <438710E1.2000202@trash.net> <4387A946.3000005@eurodev.net> <20051129040925.GC3544@rama.towersoft.de> <438CDF45.9040308@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <438CDF45.9040308@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: > Harald Welte wrote: > >> No, I oppose any kind of kernel version number checking. I'd rather >> break 2.6.14 with new versions of the userspace. >> > The stable tree has a couple of patches pending, so I guess there > will be another release. I'll ask them if they would take a patch > to fix this issue. Any update on this? -- Pablo