From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Deti Fliegl Subject: Re: problem with conntrack utility and kernel 2.6.14 Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:53:21 +0100 Message-ID: <43931F01.1040204@fliegl.de> References: <4361EAAB.1090206@fliegl.de> <4361F6DF.3050106@eurodev.net> <43621028.40705@fliegl.de> <43627A8F.9060307@eurodev.net> <436281BB.2010100@fliegl.de> <4392510A.3030400@eurodev.net> <4393149F.8080302@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso , romary@nikoon.com Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <4393149F.8080302@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: > Interesting. I guess that rules out bad hardware in Deti's case. I still > can't see how this can happen, but I'm going to have another look. Well, I was testing on a system bought in june. Tomorrow I will setup a brand new box (but same platform) and repeat my stresstests. Deti