From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Major problem with conntrack utility and kernel 2.6.14.3 Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:17:33 +0100 Message-ID: <43945A0D.8020500@trash.net> References: <4361EAAB.1090206@fliegl.de> <436281BB.2010100@fliegl.de> <4392510A.3030400@eurodev.net> <200512041004.37192.romary@nikoon.com> <43934BC3.3090107@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Deti Fliegl , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso , Romary Sonrier Return-path: To: Krzysztof Oledzki In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Please try this patch, I hope it will fix the problems you're seeing. >> > > This patch also fixed my problem (kernel BUG at kernel/sched.c:2833). > Thank you. > > Is it possible that this patch and "Fix refcount leak > ip_conntrack/nat_proto" > (http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=00cb277a4a1fb76aafb2fb28aa99f30546e619c5) > will go to next 2.6.14-stable kernel? I'll submit them to -stable tonight.