From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Theory test
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 01:18:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4394E6E7.7090602@dsl.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fad9d4840512050942h5a9e63cbv431cbfa890fa3831@mail.gmail.com>
Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
>>Are we talking about ingress or egress?
>
>
> Egress, all my ingress experiments worked 100% (mostly prioritization,
> that's all)
That's handy I was expecting you to say ingress.
Outbound should be totally under your control.
>
>>How much bandwidth do you have (and how much are you sacrificing)?
>
>
> Sadly, only 512kbits but upgrading to 1024kbits in Feb
You have 512kbit upstream - symmetrical dsl - what rate do you set htb?
>
>>What are the lengths of queues for each user?
>
> Pardon me?
It's less relevant for egress - for ingress shaping the length of the
queues if too long can mess things up, and unless you use esfq it would
have been hard when shaping 200 users to reduce it/them.
>
>
>>What is the link DSL/other?
>
>
> ADSL, African style...
Not sdsl then - is your egress 512?
Do you know what type of connection you have eg pppoa/e or bridged ip
etc. I assume whatever it is ends up as atm cells?
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-06 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-05 17:42 [LARTC] Theory test Kenneth Kalmer
2005-12-05 18:03 ` Peter Surda
2005-12-05 18:06 ` Andreas Klauer
2005-12-05 19:59 ` Andy Furniss
2005-12-05 22:57 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-12-05 23:01 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-12-05 23:03 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-12-06 1:18 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
2005-12-06 13:48 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-12-06 16:11 ` Andy Furniss
2005-12-06 18:50 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-12-06 20:07 ` Andy Furniss
2005-12-06 21:52 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-12-06 22:17 ` Kenneth Kalmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4394E6E7.7090602@dsl.pipex.com \
--to=andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.