From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 01:18:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Theory test Message-Id: <4394E6E7.7090602@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Kenneth Kalmer wrote: >>Are we talking about ingress or egress? > > > Egress, all my ingress experiments worked 100% (mostly prioritization, > that's all) That's handy I was expecting you to say ingress. Outbound should be totally under your control. > >>How much bandwidth do you have (and how much are you sacrificing)? > > > Sadly, only 512kbits but upgrading to 1024kbits in Feb You have 512kbit upstream - symmetrical dsl - what rate do you set htb? > >>What are the lengths of queues for each user? > > Pardon me? It's less relevant for egress - for ingress shaping the length of the queues if too long can mess things up, and unless you use esfq it would have been hard when shaping 200 users to reduce it/them. > > >>What is the link DSL/other? > > > ADSL, African style... Not sdsl then - is your egress 512? Do you know what type of connection you have eg pppoa/e or bridged ip etc. I assume whatever it is ends up as atm cells? Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc