From: "Vladimir A. Barinov" <vbarinov@ru.mvista.com>
To: ralf@linux-mips.org, ppopov@embeddedalley.com
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Philips PNX8550 command line patch]
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:26:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43986CB8.9000000@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 60 bytes --]
Sorry, but it seems that this mail was lost :(
resending...
[-- Attachment #2: Re: [PATCH] Philips PNX8550 command line patch --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1691 bytes --]
From: "Vladimir A. Barinov" <vbarinov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Peter Popov <ppopov@embeddedalley.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Philips PNX8550 command line patch
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:02:12 +0300
Message-ID: <43986714.2020806@ru.mvista.com>
Hello Pete, Ralf,
Peter Popov wrote:
>--- Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:02:14PM +0300, Vladimir
>>A. Barinov wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>This patch makes passing command line from
>>>
>>>
>>bootloader for Philips
>>
>>
>>>PNX8550 platform.
>>>Does it makes sense to commit this patch?
>>>
>>>
>>Looks ok at a quick glance. I'll wait a bit so Pete
>>has a chance to comment.
>>
>>
>
>Looks fine to me.
>
>
Sorry for my misunderstood but I suppose that this patch should be
ignored since it
used JBS board dependent code and I have STB810 that based on the code
of JBS.
But JBS board could have firmware that differs from that STB810 uses. So
the command line
could be parsed incorrectly for JBS, it's needed to check by somebody
who has JBS board.
I prepared STB810 board dependent patch that include this fix for
command-line parsing for STB810 board only.
So Ralf please ignore this patch though it was approved by you and Pete.
Vladimir
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Vladimir A. Barinov" <vbarinov@ru.mvista.com>
To: ralf@linux-mips.org, ppopov@embeddedalley.com
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Philips PNX8550 command line patch]
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:26:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43986CB8.9000000@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20051208172616.-SrveN4sKrD0fR_XwWM30J2iGhacoNBtmhC3FX_1n18@z> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 60 bytes --]
Sorry, but it seems that this mail was lost :(
resending...
[-- Attachment #2: Re: [PATCH] Philips PNX8550 command line patch --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1690 bytes --]
From: "Vladimir A. Barinov" <vbarinov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Peter Popov <ppopov@embeddedalley.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Philips PNX8550 command line patch
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:02:12 +0300
Message-ID: <43986714.2020806@ru.mvista.com>
Hello Pete, Ralf,
Peter Popov wrote:
>--- Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:02:14PM +0300, Vladimir
>>A. Barinov wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>This patch makes passing command line from
>>>
>>>
>>bootloader for Philips
>>
>>
>>>PNX8550 platform.
>>>Does it makes sense to commit this patch?
>>>
>>>
>>Looks ok at a quick glance. I'll wait a bit so Pete
>>has a chance to comment.
>>
>>
>
>Looks fine to me.
>
>
Sorry for my misunderstood but I suppose that this patch should be
ignored since it
used JBS board dependent code and I have STB810 that based on the code
of JBS.
But JBS board could have firmware that differs from that STB810 uses. So
the command line
could be parsed incorrectly for JBS, it's needed to check by somebody
who has JBS board.
I prepared STB810 board dependent patch that include this fix for
command-line parsing for STB810 board only.
So Ralf please ignore this patch though it was approved by you and Pete.
Vladimir
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-08 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-08 17:26 Vladimir A. Barinov [this message]
2005-12-08 17:26 ` [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Philips PNX8550 command line patch] Vladimir A. Barinov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43986CB8.9000000@ru.mvista.com \
--to=vbarinov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ppopov@embeddedalley.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.