All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SAL calling conventions + locking
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:42:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4399B3EE.6050408@bull.net> (raw)

The SAL specification does say that the SAL procedures should be called
with interrupts enabled if we call them in virtual mode.

Here is the simplified CPEI handler control flow:

ia64_mca_cpe_int_handler():

	/* SAL spec states this should run w/ interrupts enabled */
	local_irq_enable();
	ia64_mca_log_sal_error_record(SAL_INFO_TYPE_CPE):

		ia64_log_get():

			IA64_LOG_LOCK():

				spin_lock_irqsave():

			ia64_sal_get_state_info();
			IA64_LOG_UNLOCK()

		salinfo_log_wakeup()
		if (rh->severity = sal_log_severity_corrected)
			ia64_sal_clear_state_info();

Despite the note "SAL spec ... w/ interrupts enabled" the interrupts
are disabled before "ia64_sal_get_state_info()" is invoked.

Can someone please tell me:
- why the spec. requires to call the SAL with interrupts enabled,
- why Linux calls the SAL with interrupts disabled,
- what happens if the SAL is called with interrupts disabled?

The second issue is:
The lock of the log is released before "salinfo_log_wakeup()" could record
the existence of the current log. Two more logs can arrive and overwrite
the current log without even indicting the loss of the information.
(E.g. CPEI-s with interrupt redirection, CMCI-s on multiple CPUs.)
Should not we keep the log lock at least while "salinfo_log_wakeup()"
executes?

Thanks.

Zoltan Menyhart

             reply	other threads:[~2005-12-09 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-09 16:42 Zoltan Menyhart [this message]
2005-12-09 17:03 ` SAL calling conventions + locking Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4399B3EE.6050408@bull.net \
    --to=zoltan.menyhart@bull.net \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.