From: Manish Kathuria <manish@tuxspace.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Use of CONNMARK in Multiple Internet Links
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:55:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4399B6C5.3070401@tuxspace.com> (raw)
What are the pros and cons of using CONNMARK along with the Multiple ISP
Links and Load Balancing method as suggested in the HOWTO and with
Julian's patches for Dead Gateway Detection ? I have been observing
excellent results without the CONNMARK rules. How is the performance
affected if CONNMARK is used ?
Thanks,
Manish
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
reply other threads:[~2005-12-09 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4399B6C5.3070401@tuxspace.com \
--to=manish@tuxspace.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.