From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBHFgZXf011012 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:42:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from postoffice9.mail.cornell.edu (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBHFgXsp028074 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:42:33 GMT Message-ID: <43A43599.2080801@cornell.edu> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:58:17 -0500 From: Ivan Gyurdiev MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel J Walsh CC: SE Linux Subject: Re: New strategy for enableaudit. References: <43A4182B.9000402@redhat.com> <43A42F09.8080204@cornell.edu> <43A42D3A.1090907@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <43A42D3A.1090907@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov > This is only a short term solution until we get boolean support for > dontaudit rules. But modules could do the same thing. This > gives me the ability to debug problems being covered by dontaudit > rules for now though. So what's the planned solution using boolean support? There's a number of things that could be done here... Are you thinking of the module compiler placing dontaudit rules in a conditional block, based on a shared (base) boolean? -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.