From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [bug] don't try this at home...
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:55:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43A56A44.6020308@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A34F6C.6020904@domain.hid>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1514 bytes --]
Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Fixed. The cause was related to the thread migration routine to
>>> primary mode (xnshadow_harden), which would spuriously call the Linux
>>> rescheduling procedure from the primary domain under certain
>>> circumstances. This bug only triggers on preemptible kernels. This
>>> also fixes the spinlock recursion issue which is sometimes triggered
>>> when the spinlock debug option is active.
>>>
>>
>> Gasp. I've found a severe regression with this fix, so more work is
>> needed. More later.
>>
>
> End of alert. Should be ok now.
>
No crashes so far, looks good. But the final test, a box which always
went to hell very quickly, is still waiting in my office - more on Monday.
Anyway, there seems to be some latency issues pending. I discovered this
again with my migration test. Please give it a try on a mid- (800 MHz
Athlon in my case) to low-end box. On that Athlon I got peaks of over
100 us in the userspace latency test right on starting migration. The
Athlon does not support the NMI watchdog, but on my 1.4 GHz Notebook
there were alarms (>30 us) hitting in the native registry during
rt_task_create. I have no clue yet if anything is broken there. We need
that back-tracer soon - did I mentioned this before? ;)
BTW, a kernel timer latency test based on a RTDM device is half-done.
I'm able to dump kernel-based timed-task latencies via a patched
testsuite latency. Histograms need to be added as well as a timer
handler latency test. Will keep you posted.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-18 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-30 16:35 [Xenomai-core] [bug] don't try this at home Jan Kiszka
2005-11-30 17:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2005-11-30 17:45 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-12-07 12:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2005-12-07 13:08 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-12-07 17:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2005-12-09 12:53 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-12-16 20:26 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-12-16 20:56 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-12-16 23:36 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-12-18 13:55 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2005-12-18 18:30 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-12-18 18:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2005-12-18 19:19 ` Philippe Gerum
2005-12-22 15:05 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43A56A44.6020308@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.