From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mikado Subject: Re: multiple internet connections and routing Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:49:51 +0700 Message-ID: <43A6D69F.3040605@gmail.com> References: <43A68D0F.7000807@vdbogaard.com> <65aa6af90512190706o4d1d6f1co656bc5c5f3eed21d@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mikado4vn@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <65aa6af90512190706o4d1d6f1co656bc5c5f3eed21d@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Edmundo Carmona Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hope this link work for you: http://tetro.net/misc/multilink.html Edmundo Carmona wrote: > You set ip to use separate routing tables. > > with iproute2 you can use different routing tables for different traffic. > > You can tell ip to use a routing table X (which only has a single > default GW using one of your wan links) for traffic coming from LAN x, > and to use routing table Y (which only has a default gateway using the > other wan link) for traffic coming from lan y. That should do. > > Guidelines: > http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.html > This is interesting too: > http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html > > Oh... and consider posting in the larct mail list, cause I think it's > "fitter" there. :-)... you're welcome. ;-) > > On 12/19/05, Paul van den Bogaard wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>currently I have two firewalls. Each firewall connects its own internal >>network to the Internet using its own single (broadband) connection. >> >>This means I have two similar setups running in parallel >> >>I would like to do this all on a single firewall. Not sure how to go there. >> >>Result should be one firewall doing NAT, such that >> >> all trafic from/to network 10.1.5 (interface eth1) should go interface >>eth0 (internet gateway 1) >> all trafic from/to network 10.1.6 (interface eth2) should go to >>interface eth3 (internet gateway 2) >> >> If one of the internet gateways is unable to operate (provider failure, >>routing error up stream) I should be able to temporarely route all >>traffic to the other internet gateway. >> >>How to configure the box? >> >>Help, links etc are very much appreciated. >> >>Thanks >>Paul van den Bogaard >> >> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDptaemS/zF9V69ugRArjkAJ4tP3vsSn9ovmoB0ORrLq7/TqLDUACdGMfe fS6MaL5amVRE/H1yFyquXxs= =tD4i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----