All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IOMMU and scatterlist limits
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:36:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43A7ECCB.2060108@drzeus.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A7E692.90103@gmail.com>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> Revisiting a dear old thread. :)
>>
>> After some initial tests, some more questions popped up. See below.
>>
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 17 2005, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>>>  
>>>
>>>> Since there is no guarantee this will be mapped down to one segment
>>>> (that the hardware can accept), is it expected that the driver
>>>> iterates
>>>> over the entire list or can I mark only the first segment as completed
>>>> and wait for the request to be reissued? (this is a MMC driver, which
>>>> behaves like the block layer)
>>>>    
>>>
>>> Ah MMC, that explains a few things :-)
>>>
>>> It's quite legal (and possible) to partially handle a given request,
>>> you
>>> are not obliged to handle a request as a single unit. See how other
>>> block drivers have an end request handling function ala:
>>>
>>>  
>>
>>
>> After testing this it seems the block layer never gives me more than
>> max_hw_segs segments. Is it being clever because I'm compiling for a
>> system without an IOMMU?
>>
>> The hardware should (haven't properly tested this) be able to get new
>> DMA addresses during a transfer. In essence scatter gather with some CPU
>> support. Since I avoid MMC overhead this should give a nice performance
>> boost. But this relies on the block layer giving me more than one
>> segment. Do I need to lie in max_hw_segs to achieve this?
>>
>
> Hi, Pierre.
>
> max_phys_segments: the maximum number of segments in a request
>            *before* DMA mapping
>
> max_hw_segments: the maximum number of segments in a request
>          *after* DMA mapping (ie. after IOMMU merging)
>
> Those maximum numbers are for block layer.  Block layer must not
> exceed above limits when it passes a request downward.  As long as all
> entries in sg are processed, block layer doesn't care whether sg
> iteration is performed by the driver or hardware.
>
> So, if you're gonna perform sg by iterating in the driver, what
> numbers to report for max_phys_segments and max_hw_segments is
> entirely upto how many entries the driver can handle.
>
> Just report some nice number (64 or 128?) for both.  Don't forget that
> the number of sg entries can be decreased after DMA-mapping on
> machines with IOMMU.
>
> IOW, the part which performs sg iteration gets to determine above
> limits.  In your case, the driver is reponsible for both iterations
> (pre and post DMA mapping), so all the limits are upto the driver.
>
>

I'm still a bit confused why the block layer needs to know the maximum
number of hw segments. Different hardware might be connected to
different IOMMU:s, so only the driver will now how much the number can
be reduced. So the block layer should only care about not going above
max_phys_segments, since that's what the driver has room for.

What is the scenario that requires both?

Rgds
Pierre


  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-20 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-17  8:34 IOMMU and scatterlist limits Pierre Ossman
2005-11-17  8:54 ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-17  9:02   ` Pierre Ossman
2005-11-17  9:13     ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-17  9:27       ` Pierre Ossman
2005-11-17  9:38         ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-17  9:49           ` Pierre Ossman
2005-11-17 12:02             ` Jens Axboe
2005-12-18 22:41           ` Pierre Ossman
2005-12-20 11:10             ` Tejun Heo
2005-12-20 11:36               ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
2005-12-20 12:04                 ` Tejun Heo
2005-12-20 12:28                   ` Pierre Ossman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43A7ECCB.2060108@drzeus.cx \
    --to=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.