From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leonardo Borda Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:53:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Advanced Routing and Secondary ip address in eth0 Message-Id: <43A95E40.8020909@netwall.com.br> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0266954360==" List-Id: References: <43A85B7A.90808@netwall.com.br> In-Reply-To: <43A85B7A.90808@netwall.com.br> To: lartc@vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0266954360== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000705040202020002070309" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000705040202020002070309 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi gypsy, Thank you for your help, but I have configured with succes Routing=20 for multiple uplinks/providers and it is working just fine. My problem is when I have a secondary address range in one of these=20 cards (NICs), in my case eth0 (two ranges from the same internet provider ). =20 Anybody has a configuration like this? - Eth0 ( two internet ranges address from the same router/provider ) - eth1 ( another ISP ) - eth2 LAN ?? Thanks in advanced. gypsy escreveu: >Leonardo Borda wrote: > =20 > >>Hello, >> >> I have configured advanced routing with success using three (03) >>network adapters ( ETH0, ETH1 and ETH2). >> Now I have to configure an addittion range in the same Interface >>ETH0 ( another internet ip range address ), so I would like to have TWO >>different ranges at the same ETHERNET CARD ( in this case ETH0 ) AND >>having advanced routing running it. >> I Did the same configurations as I already done it before and it is >>not working. When testing through the secondary ip address the packets >>get out from the wrong default gateway, however testing from primary >>range I am able to route. >> >> Is it possible to do advanced routing having in the same Interface >>TWO different ip range address? >> >> Somebody had done this somewhere? >> >>Thanks in advanced >> >>-- >>Atenciosamente, >> >>Leonardo Borda >> =20 >> > >Leonardo, > >Have you Yahooed/googled this? IIRC, I came across several pages >describing your desired setup while trying to decide how to deal with 3 >NICs and two different IPS (therefore separate nets on each NIC). Again >IIRC, I rejected these because they were not the correct solution for >me. > >Sorry I can't be more help, but I do think your solution is "out there". >-- >gypsy > > > =20 > --=20 Atenciosamente, Leonardo Borda - Diretor de Neg=F3cios Netwall Tecnologia Fone/Fax: +55 51 3388.3201 Celular: +55 51 8131.9740 mailto:borda@netwall.com.br - http://www.netwall.com.br --------------000705040202020002070309 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi gypsy,

    Thank you for your help, but I have configured with succes Routing for multiple uplinks/providers and it is working just fine.
    My problem is when I have a secondary address range in one of these cards (NICs), in my case eth0 (two ranges from the same internet provider ).
   
    Anybody has a configuration like this?
    - Eth0 ( two internet ranges address from the same router/provider )
    - eth1 ( another ISP )
    - eth2 LAN

??

Thanks in advanced.


gypsy escreveu:
Leonardo Borda wrote:
  
Hello,

    I have configured advanced routing with success using three (03)
network adapters ( ETH0,  ETH1 and ETH2).
    Now I have to configure an addittion range in the same Interface
ETH0 ( another internet ip range address ), so I would like to have TWO
different ranges at the same ETHERNET CARD ( in this case ETH0 ) AND
having advanced routing running it.
    I Did the same configurations as I already done it before and it is
not working. When testing through the secondary ip address the packets
get out from the wrong default gateway, however testing from primary
range I am able to route.

    Is it possible to do advanced routing having in the same Interface
TWO different ip range address?

    Somebody had done this somewhere?

Thanks in advanced

--
Atenciosamente,

Leonardo Borda
    

Leonardo,

Have you Yahooed/googled this?  IIRC, I came across several pages
describing your desired setup while trying to decide how to deal with 3
NICs and two different IPS (therefore separate nets on each NIC).  Again
IIRC, I rejected these because they were not the correct solution for
me.

Sorry I can't be more help, but I do think your solution is "out there".
--
gypsy


  

-- 
Atenciosamente,

Leonardo Borda - Diretor de Negócios
Netwall Tecnologia
Fone/Fax: +55 51 3388.3201
Celular:  +55 51 8131.9740
mailto:borda@netwall.com.br - http://www.netwall.com.br
--------------000705040202020002070309-- --===============0266954360== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc --===============0266954360==--