From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diego Cabrero Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:53:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Uplink shapping Message-Id: <43B01FFD.7050302@e-attico.net> List-Id: References: <43AFCEF0.2060703@e-attico.net> In-Reply-To: <43AFCEF0.2060703@e-attico.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Well, i have them isolated, let's say there are two computers conected=20 by a single ethernet cable and i'm doing trials, so then i will=20 implement this control over a linux server conected to a DSL router=20 through ethernet . But firstly it needs to work out over the two=20 isolated computers, and i guess it is just needed to control the net=20 board by the router side. Is there anything wrong with this trial=20 benchmark setting?. Thanks. Hammond, Robin-David%KB3IEN escribi=F3: > > Im a bit confused. Do you have 2 linux computers ethernetworked to an=20 > ADSL bridge? an ascii schematic of the network might help us understand. > > On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Diego Cabrero wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:07:28 +0100 >> From: Diego Cabrero >> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >> Subject: [LARTC] Uplink shapping >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm controling the uplink traffic bandwidth between two ethernet=20 >> linux computers, but it seems like even the download bandwidth >> gets limited then i've got trouble on that because my intention is =20 >> shaping the conection on an asymetric way (ADSL). Lately, I'm >> going crazy, this problem has got me pretty worried and i'm not=20 >> figuring out at all, the reasons why this weird bug happens. >> >> I'd appreciate some help guys. thanks >> _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc