From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1776B68910 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:15:00 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <43B3D3F2.6060708@grandegger.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:17:54 +0100 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alessandro Rubini References: <43B2A902.3090008@varma-el.com> <200512271730.28563.david.jander@protonic.nl> <20051227214949.GA8236@mail.gnudd.com> <200512281000.12073.david.jander@protonic.nl> <20051228150742.GA18401@mail.gnudd.com> In-Reply-To: <20051228150742.GA18401@mail.gnudd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: david.jander@protonic.nl, r.schwebel@pengutronix.de, socket-can@pengutronix.de, Jan Kiszka , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Which CAN driver to port to for PPC List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Alessandro Rubini wrote: >>Robert Schwebel et al have worked socket based CAN (i.e. implement CAN >>as _net_ dev, not as char) > > > That's great. I've always been convinced it is the right way to go. > I remember I've said so to a friend in March 2002. Unfortunately, > I had no time to do it the right way, due to short deadlines and > tight budget. I'm happy Robert did it. FYI, there is also a RTDM/Xenomai based version of the SJA1000 socket-based CAN driver at http://www.rts.uni-hannover.de/mitarbeiter/kiszka/rtaddon/ As RTDM/Xenomai is avaiable for PowerPC as well, it might be an option. Wolfgang. > /alessandro > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded > >