All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark v Wolher <trilight@ns666.com>
To: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: system keeps freezing once every 24 hours / random apps crashing
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:20:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43B5CEB8.9070801@ns666.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512302356.59749.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>

Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 23:42, Mark v Wolher wrote:
> 
>>Alistair John Strachan wrote:
>>
>>>On Friday 30 December 2005 22:16, Mark v Wolher wrote:
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Basically you are asking for help with an unsupported configuration.  In
>>>>>general people on LKML will be more helpful if you take the time to find
>>>>>out what the bug reporting guidelines are before posting.
>>>>>
>>>>>Lee
>>>>
>>>>Thank you for your input, but sometimes thinking out of the box gives a
>>>>solution instead of hiding behind "guidelines".
>>>
>>>I'm surprised Lee fed you this long, but the cold hard fact of the matter
>>>is that you are posting to the Linux kernel mailing lists, and you will
>>>comply with these guidelines if you expect help.
>>>
>>>I'm sure the problem might not be with VMWare, but there is absolutely
>>>nothing stopping you from switching nvidia with nv, not loading
>>>nvidia/vmware modules, then running the TV card doing *something else*
>>>for a few hours. If you do not detect lockups, contact VMWare. They will
>>>probably do the exact opposite of what Lee has done and suggest
>>>non-VMWare parts of the system are at fault.
>>>
>>>However, unlike VMWare or NVIDIA, we can actually debug problems if you
>>>use source-available modules. Thinking outside of the box here is
>>>irrelevant -- a problem requires logical procedure to gain a solution.
>>>Any engineer will tell you the same thing. Ordinarily, this is test,
>>>observe, retest, and all Lee is suggesting is that you do *not* load the
>>>proprietary modules.
>>>
>>>Try it before responding to this email, so you do not have to write
>>>another.
>>
>>I already switched nvidia for the nv driver in the kernel. Also disabled
>>by unloading all modules.
> 
> 
> As Lee already explained, "unloading" is insufficient. If you continue to 
> argue that it is sufficient, then you are only exposing your own ignorance of 
> the issues at hand. Please physically delete the modules so that they cannot 
> ever be loaded by the kernel during or after bootup, then reboot the machine 
> before testing.
> 
> 
>>You're saying i should then see what happens after doing the above ...
>>This is exactly what i'm now doing, tvcard is active (tv) and i'm doing
>>some work as usual. I get the feeling some people consider everyone who
>>is a bit different in approach as either some newbie or an idiot, well
>>wake up, sometimes by looking from a different view at a problem it can
>>be solved. This doesn't mean i don't appreciate the advise of Lee or
>>yours, i only ask for some patience. It's not like the world is going
>>under if we don't solve this in an hour with traditional logic. :)
> 
> 
> Feel free to try any method you like, but the method myself and Lee have 
> stated is the only one acceptable on this list.
> 
> 
>>And at this point the system is still working, i'm increasing the load
>>by making it crush numbers, doing a full virusscan and so on.
> 
> 
> This is good news -- you stand a better chance of achieving the stability you 
> require by eliminating variables. VMWare and NVIDIA are useful softwares, and 
> I would not deny that, but they are closed source and thus any conflicts 
> resulting from their use are not necessary LKML material (however, if the 
> interaction is generic and is as a result of a kernel bug, then the 
> maintainer would very much like to hear it).
> 

Okay, i have something interesting now, i only had the nvidia module
loaded so my x-configuration starts up as usual. (not saying the nvidia
module is flawless, i'm sure it still contains bugs)
But here is the crash info, this time it was mozilla, i think this
speaks more hehe :

Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: mm/memory.c:106: bad pgd 061f0c08.
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: mm/memory.c:106: bad pgd 06b96000.
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: mm/memory.c:106: bad pgd 18000bf8.
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: kernel BUG at mm/mmap.c:2214!
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: invalid operand: 0000 [#1]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: SMP
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: Modules linked in: nvidia
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: CPU:    2
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: EIP:    0060:[exit_mmap+323/400]
Tainted: PF     VLI
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: EFLAGS: 00010202   (2.6.14.5)
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: eax: 00000071   ebx: 00000000   ecx:
c9b02660   edx: dff65e00
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: esi: 00000000   edi: 00000007   ebp:
de48d0c0   esp: cb4b5dfc
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: Process mozilla-bin (pid: 22417,
threadinfo=cb4b4000 task=c9f25030)
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: Stack: c9b02628 00000000 00000000 00000000
ffffffff cb4b5e1c 00000000 c1411600
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: 000070a6 de48d080 de48d0c4 c9f254dc
00000009 c0162d68 de48d080 c9f25030
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: cb4b4000 c0167b7b de48d080 00000009
00000009 cb4b4000 00000001 00000009
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: Call Trace:
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [mmput+56/160]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [do_exit+235/1040]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [do_group_exit+64/176]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [get_signal_to_deliver+560/832]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [do_signal+143/288]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [free_task+39/48]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [pg0+548271682/1066550272]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [pg0+550504623/1066550272]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [__do_softirq+214/240]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [do_notify_resume+55/64]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: [work_notifysig+19/37]
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: Code: 00 85 f6 74 14 8d 76 00 8b 5e 0c 89
34 24 e8 45 d7 ff ff 85 db 89 de 75 ef 8b bf 94 00 00 00 85 ff 75 08 83 c4
24 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 <0f> 0b a6 08 73 e3 57 c0 eb ee c7 43 08 00 00 00 00 8b 03
89 04
Dec 31 00:55:28 localhost kernel: <1>Fixing recursive fault but reboot is
needed!


And i appreciate your time and bother.












  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-31  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-30 14:05 system keeps freezing once every 24 hours / random apps crashing Trilight
2005-12-30 14:11 ` Ochal Christophe
2005-12-30 14:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-30 15:52   ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 16:37     ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 16:47       ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-12-30 17:14         ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 18:30           ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-12-30 19:22             ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 20:24               ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-12-30 20:58                 ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 21:15                   ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 21:30                     ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 21:35                       ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30 21:47                         ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 21:51                           ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30 21:57                             ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 22:00                               ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30 22:05                                 ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 22:11                                   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30 22:16                                     ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 23:11                                       ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-12-30 23:42                                         ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-30 23:56                                           ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-12-31  0:20                                             ` Mark v Wolher [this message]
2005-12-31  0:27                                               ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-12-31  0:42                                                 ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31  0:51                                                   ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-12-31  0:54                                                     ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31 10:31                                                       ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31 11:08                                                         ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-31 11:40                                                           ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31 11:49                                                             ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-31 12:46                                                               ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31 15:18                                                                 ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31 15:22                                                                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-31 15:34                                                                     ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31 15:51                                                                   ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31 16:34                                                                   ` Sami Farin
2005-12-31 16:48                                                                     ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31 17:02                                                                       ` Sami Farin
2005-12-31 17:26                                                                         ` Mark v Wolher
2005-12-31 22:01                                                                       ` Sami Farin
2006-01-01  2:26                                                                       ` Mark v Wolher
2006-01-01 13:06                                                                         ` Mark v Wolher
2006-01-01 14:47                                                                           ` Mark v Wolher
2006-01-01 17:47                                                                             ` Mark v Wolher
2006-01-01 18:38                                                                               ` Jiri Slaby
2006-01-01 18:49                                                                                 ` Mark v Wolher
2006-01-01 19:01                                                                                   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2006-01-01 19:12                                                                                     ` Jiri Slaby
2006-01-01 19:37                                                                                       ` Mark v Wolher
2006-01-01 23:20                                                                                         ` Re; system keeps freezing once every 24 hours / random apps crashing Peter Missel
2006-01-02 22:29                                                                                           ` Alan Cox
2006-01-03  0:19                                                                                             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2006-01-01 18:49                                                                                 ` Folkert van Heusden
2006-01-01 18:54                                                                                   ` Mark v Wolher
2006-01-01 20:49                                                                                     ` Folkert van Heusden
2006-01-01 21:38                                                                                       ` Mark v Wolher
2006-01-01 21:41                                                                                         ` Lee Revell
2006-01-01 22:01                                                                                           ` Mark v Wolher
2006-01-25 12:46                                                                                 ` Jiri Slaby
2006-01-01 15:14                                                                           ` Sami Farin
2005-12-31 11:23                                                   ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-31 11:31     ` Jesper Juhl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43B5CEB8.9070801@ns666.com \
    --to=trilight@ns666.com \
    --cc=folkert@vanheusden.com \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.