From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matt Ayres <matta@tektonic.net>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Backports to 3.0-testing and/or 3.0.1
	soon?
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 13:44:07 -0500
Message-ID: <43BAC5F7.70603@tektonic.net>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D409F3F@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D409F3F@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>,
	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>,
	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen users mailing list <xen-users@lists.xensource.com>, ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org



Ian Pratt wrote:
>> I am noticing many bug fixes, code cleanups, and improvements 
>> being committed to -unstable over the past few weeks and 
>> little or no commits to 3.0-testing.
>>
>> Is a back port of some of these to 3.0-testing expected to 
>> happen soon? 
> 
> We're not planning on backporting stuff into 3.0.0.x -- we'll stabilise
> the tree and do a 3.0.1.0 release in maybe 2-4 weeks time.
> 

Ian,

Isn't the 3.0-testing tree meant to for users who want to test new fixes 
  before a release is made and to accelerate and refine the QA process? 
  If there are no back ports before a release then there is no point to 
a 3.0-testing tree.

Thank you,
Matt Ayres