From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scsi scan bug when peripheral qualifier of 3 is returned
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:31:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BC30A2.3090403@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060104190119.GA4700@us.ibm.com>
Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> So yes we should always set *bflagsp. i.e.:
>
> --- linux-2.6.15/drivers/scsi/orig-scsi_scan.c 2006-01-02 21:52:12.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.15/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c 2006-01-04 10:58:36.000000000 -0800
> @@ -891,13 +891,13 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
> }
>
> res = scsi_add_lun(sdev, result, &bflags);
> + if (bflagsp)
> + *bflagsp = bflags;
For SCSI_SCAN_TARGET_PRESENT, we never get this far. We bail out a
couple of lines above in the check for PQ=3. Also, for some boxes like
Clarions we have this in devinfo:
{"DGC", "RAID", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN}, /* Dell PV 650F,
storage on LUN 0 */
{"DGC", "DISK", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN},
But LUN0 shows up as DGC/LUNZ. When we used to hardcode BLIST_SPARSELUN
as a argument to scsi_sequential_lun_scan, we could find a least 8
devices but now we hit this in scsi_sequential_lun_scan:
/*
* If not sparse lun and no device attached at LUN 0 do not scan
* any further.
*/
if (!sparse_lun && (lun0_res != SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT))
return;
Does IBM's fastt/DS or other boxes have this problem too? For Clarions
do I just have to add a DGC/LUNZ entry to the devinfo list?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-04 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-04 7:11 scsi scan bug when peripheral qualifier of 3 is returned Mike Christie
2006-01-04 17:40 ` Patrick Mansfield
2006-01-04 18:28 ` Mike Christie
2006-01-04 19:01 ` Patrick Mansfield
2006-01-04 20:31 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2006-01-04 22:25 ` Patrick Mansfield
2006-01-05 16:56 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43BC30A2.3090403@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.