From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] use HOPLIMIT metric as TTL of TCP reset sent by REJECT [was: Re: please fix TARPIT] Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:21:12 +0100 Message-ID: <43BCD6F8.8020706@trash.net> References: <20051221.221552.70499588.davem@davemloft.net> <43BA5E7C.1090008@trash.net> <200601050808.k0588nH1012513@toshiba.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, davem@davemloft.net Return-path: To: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI In-Reply-To: <200601050808.k0588nH1012513@toshiba.co.jp> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote: > Should ipt_REJECT use metric, too ? ip6_REJECT has already use it. Looks good. Dave, please apply on top of my patches. > BTW, I'm not familiar with TARPIT, but ipt_REJECT seems to have the codes > to fix the other issues David pointed out. Yes, looks like we could use some of the ipt_REJECT code. But we decided to move TARPIT out of pom after moving to something apt-get like anyway, so I'd rather spend time on that.