From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <43BCF891.1080402@domain.hid>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:44:33 +0100
From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <43BC4FFB.8040709@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <43BC4FFB.8040709@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: adeos-main@gna.org, xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> here comes the first update of the new latency tracer.
> 
>  arch/i386/kernel/entry.S      |   27 +++

Is there any good reason to patch the callers of __ipipe_handle_irq 
instead of instrumenting the callee directly?

>  arch/i386/kernel/ipipe-root.c |    4
>  include/asm-i386/system.h     |   70 +++++++++
>  include/linux/ipipe_trace.h   |    3
>  kernel/ipipe/Kconfig          |   18 ++
>  kernel/ipipe/tracer.c         |  247 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  6 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> 


-- 

Philippe.