All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: berk walker <berk@panix.com>
To: Francois Barre <francois.barre@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ?
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 06:59:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BD0A16.7070700@panix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd8d0180601050335ob7b791cm@mail.gmail.com>

Francois Barre wrote:

>2006/1/5, berk walker <berk@panix.com>:
>[...]
>  
>
>>>      
>>>
>>Ext3 does have a fine record.  Might I also suggest an added expense of
>>18 1/2% and do RAID6 for better protection against data loss?
>>b-
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Well, I guess so. I just hope I'll be given enough money for it, since
>it increases the cost per GB. Anyway I guess that it is preferable
>than a raid5 + 1 spare.
>By the way, not really a raid-oriented question, but what is the exact
>robustness of ext3 resizing ? I mean : what happens if the box crashes
>while resizing an ext3 ?
>This implies, of course, resizing capabilities for raid6, which is not
>implement yet. Is it ?
>-
>  
>
I can not speak to that, sorry.
b-


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-05 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fd8d0180601050104x15079396h@mail.gmail.com>
2006-01-05  9:06 ` Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ? Francois Barre
2006-01-05 10:14   ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-05 11:21     ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 11:31       ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-06  6:33       ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-06  9:47       ` Simon Valiquette
2006-01-06 10:50         ` Francois Barre
2006-01-06 19:28           ` Forrest Taylor
2006-01-06 11:03         ` Kanotix crashed my raid PFC
2006-01-06 12:02           ` PFC
2006-01-06 12:08             ` PFC
2006-01-06 22:01               ` PFC
     [not found]                 ` <200601090803.03588.mlaks@verizon.net>
2006-01-09 18:30                   ` PFC
2006-01-06 19:05         ` Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ? Mike Hardy
2006-01-08  2:53         ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-05 11:26     ` berk walker
2006-01-05 11:35       ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 11:43         ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-05 11:59         ` berk walker [this message]
2006-01-05 13:13         ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-01-05 13:38   ` John Stoffel
2006-01-05 14:03     ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 18:55       ` John Stoffel
2006-01-06  9:08         ` Francois Barre
2006-01-06 10:49           ` Andre Majorel
2006-01-09  8:00             ` Molle Bestefich
2006-01-09  8:16               ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-09  9:00                 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-09  9:24                   ` Molle Bestefich
2006-01-05 17:32 Andrew Burgess
2006-01-05 17:50 ` Francois Barre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43BD0A16.7070700@panix.com \
    --to=berk@panix.com \
    --cc=francois.barre@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.