From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <43BD8BC0.50503@domain.hid>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:12:32 +0100
From: Hannes Mayer <h.mayer@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Adeos-main] 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 vs. 2.6.14-i386-1.1-01
List-Id: General discussion about Adeos <adeos-main.gna.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main>,
	<mailto:adeos-main-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/adeos-main>
List-Post: <mailto:adeos-main@gna.org>
List-Help: <mailto:adeos-main-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main>,
	<mailto:adeos-main-request@domain.hid>
To: adeos-main@gna.org

Ciao Alexis!

Quick question:
I just had a quick view, but is the 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 backport
already based on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-01 ?
(or on 2.6.14-i386-1.1-00 ?)

If the first one is the case, wouldn't it be better to name it
2.4.32-i386-1.1-01 ? Sure 2.4.32-i386-1.1-00 would be missing
but people immediately get the idea that the API, the behaviour
is the same in the 2.6 version (and it also includes the
bug-fixes from 00 to 01).

Thanks, Happy New Year and best regards,
Hannes.