Re: [Xenomai-core] heres a go at an adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-01.patch

[Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@domain.hid>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2114 bytes --]

Kent Borg wrote:

>Jim Cromie posted a patch attempt for 2.6.15 (yeah!), and the patch
>applied, but it doesn't compile for me:
>
>  [...]
>    LD      init/built-in.o
>    LD      .tmp_vmlinux1
>  arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `__ipipe_sync_stage':
>  : undefined reference to `ret_from_intr'
>  arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `__ipipe_sync_stage':
>  : undefined reference to `ret_from_intr'
>  make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>  ~/linux-2.6.15$ 
>
>For a .config I started with the stock Ubuntu 2.6.12-10-686 config
>file and then took the defaults for all the oldconfig questions.
>
>Suggestions?
>
>  
>
You get to keep both pieces ? ;-)


FWIW, the kernel was still running on my soekris 4801 til just now. (I 
rebooted)
Most of that time it was without its NFS root fs;
my laptop was unconnected.  It was doing *no* work of any kind tho.
Not that this helps...


Im trying a kernel build on my sony laptop pentium M.
differnt config than yours, but fuller than the soekris.
Its running now, Im typing on it.
wifi card works too !

Ive attached my working config - might get you going.
pls report back what made your config not work, once you find it.

::::::::::::::
ipipe/Linux
::::::::::::::
Priority=100, Id=0x00000000
irq0-15: accepted
irq32: grabbed, virtual
::::::::::::::
ipipe/version
::::::::::::::
1.1-01




FWIW, I diffed the 14 patch against mine, was puzzled at the large 
textual diffs.
Guessed that it was a file ordering diff in the tar, and then forgot to 
mention this
at send.  This seems kinda odd, since Im running linux.

Phillipe, are you running BSD  ?  </ducks>

Are you creating patches from an fs other than ext3 ?
That could explain the ordering.  If not, Im stumped.
Maybe its an svn thing, they have a berkley-db-as-fs dont they ?

hth,
jimc



Also, FWIW, Ive been reading LKML, and it appears that
Ingo Molnar's  Mutex patches have turned the corner with Linux.
Theyre not in, and Ive got no crystal ball, but I suspect they
will get into 17 or 16

a good writeup for the regular folks (like me) on this list is here:
http://lwn.net/Articles/164380/


[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 12891 bytes --]