From: stevenkaratnyk@rogers.com (Steven Karatnyk)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: ticket
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:30:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C06B2B.3040006@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43BDFEEE.4070408@rogers.com>
Hi all,
Jim Cromie wrote:
> Everyone, including Steve,
>
> Sorry for that peek of petulance in public. I havent earned that right.
> Please allow that I said it so *you* dont have to (for those that have
> thought it before).
>
> As to what set me off, Ive worked with Yuan
> (sent him a compile-only patch - I dont have the hardware)
> He took it happily, and is finishing / has finished it.
> I felt a certain loyalty.
>
> hope that clears the air,
> jimc
>
> --------------------------
> open windows let in fresh air
>
I just wanted to take a second to thank Jim for both the public and
private letters of apology, as they were appreciated. It goes without
saying, that its all water under the bridge and the air is indeed clear :)
As for the patch, I haven't attempted it yet. I do, however, and
ashamedly, have to admit to committing user error in my previous
endeavor. After reading Jean's first reply, I clued in that I had not
updated the user space tools to v2.92, but had attempted to detect with
the older v2.91. Booooo to me.
Anyways, I'll update soon.
Thanks, Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-06 5:23 [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: ticket 1944) Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-06 7:01 ` [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: ticket Jim Cromie
2006-01-06 9:06 ` [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: Ymu
2006-01-06 18:53 ` [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: ticket Jean Delvare
2006-01-06 19:08 ` [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: Jean Delvare
2006-01-06 19:16 ` [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: ticket Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-06 19:34 ` [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-06 19:41 ` Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-06 20:06 ` [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: ticket Jim Cromie
2006-01-08 1:30 ` Steven Karatnyk [this message]
2006-01-10 21:33 ` Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-11 6:56 ` CityK
2006-01-11 7:01 ` [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: ticket 1944) Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-11 22:20 ` [lm-sensors] seeking a W83687THF patch for 2.6.15 (re: ticket Jean Delvare
2006-01-12 22:37 ` Jean Delvare
2006-01-13 4:59 ` Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-14 23:54 ` Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-15 17:54 ` Jean Delvare
2006-01-15 18:00 ` Jean Delvare
2006-01-16 19:41 ` Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-16 20:11 ` Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-16 22:20 ` Jean Delvare
2006-01-16 22:27 ` Jean Delvare
2006-01-19 4:41 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2006-01-19 5:07 ` Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-19 5:20 ` Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-19 5:27 ` Steven Karatnyk
2006-01-20 7:42 ` Jean Delvare
2006-01-24 5:51 ` Steven Karatnyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43C06B2B.3040006@rogers.com \
--to=stevenkaratnyk@rogers.com \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.