From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: new time code problem
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:58:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C44A3C.6010803@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136935211.2890.11.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 708 bytes --]
The 64-bit conversion routine to convert 64-bit nsec time to a time spec.
gives an unnormalized result if the value being converted is negative. I
think there are two ways to go about fixing this. Most systems will give a
negative remainder and so need to just normalize. On the other hand, some
systems will use div64 to do the division and, I think, it expects unsigned
numbers. The attached patch uses the conservative approach of expecting the
div to be set up for unsigned numbers.
I came accross this when one of my tests set a time near 1 Jan 1970, i.e. it
is a real problem.
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
[-- Attachment #2: ktime_conversion.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 910 bytes --]
kernel/time.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.16-rc/kernel/time.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16-rc.orig/kernel/time.c
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc/kernel/time.c
@@ -702,16 +702,19 @@ void set_normalized_timespec(struct time
*
* Returns the timespec representation of the nsec parameter.
*/
-inline struct timespec ns_to_timespec(const nsec_t nsec)
+struct timespec ns_to_timespec(const nsec_t nsec)
{
struct timespec ts;
- if (nsec)
+ if (nsec) return (struct timespec){0, 0};
+
+ if (nsec < 0) {
+ ts.tv_sec = div_long_long_rem_signed(-nsec, NSEC_PER_SEC,
+ &ts.tv_nsec);
+ set_normalized_timespec(&ts, -ts.tv_sec, -ts.tv_nsec);
+ } else
ts.tv_sec = div_long_long_rem_signed(nsec, NSEC_PER_SEC,
&ts.tv_nsec);
- else
- ts.tv_sec = ts.tv_nsec = 0;
-
return ts;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-10 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-21 23:20 [PATCH 1/10] NTP: Remove pps support Roman Zippel
2006-01-10 23:20 ` john stultz
2006-01-10 23:58 ` George Anzinger [this message]
2006-01-11 0:23 ` new time code problem Thomas Gleixner
2006-01-11 1:37 ` George Anzinger
2006-01-11 9:18 ` [PATCH 1/10] NTP: Remove pps support Ulrich Windl
2006-01-12 11:58 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43C44A3C.6010803@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.