From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?U2FtdWVsIETDrWF6IEdhcmPDrWE=?= Subject: Re: Where is CONNMARK extension kernel 2.4.32? Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:20:04 +0100 Message-ID: <43C4B1A4.3070706@arcoscom.com> References: <43C0F61F.4030400@arcoscom.com> <43C2A451.1020509@arcoscom.com> <43C4003B.9080400@freesco.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <43C4003B.9080400@freesco.pl> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" To: Mac!eKs Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org The last pom-ng tested by me where the 20051231 and I'm sure the CONNMARK isn't into it. Could any netfilter guy re-add these patches into pom-ng for the 2.4 kernels? Or, better, talk with kernel guys to add them into 2.4 mainline? What do you think about this propose? Regards Mac!eKs escribió: > Samuel Díaz García napisał(a): > >>> Hi all. >>> >>> I have troubles with CONNMARK extensions into kernel 2.4.32. >>> >>> The problem I have is that I tried to patch a 2.4.32 kernel with >>> pom-ng and I cant see CONNMARK extension into the pom-ng options and >>> isn't in kernel config. >>> >>> Perhaps could be that any patch I applied before (IMQ, Layer7filter, >>> etc...) had broken it. I had compiled kernel, iptables (1.3.4) and >>> many pom-ng patches. And when I test some scripts that uses CONNMARK >>> without success (chain/tarjet error). >>> I can view /usr/local/usr/libipt_CONNMARK.so and I suppose that is >>> the reason why I can view "iptables -j CONNMARK --help" help text, >>> but I can't see any "/lib/modules/2.4.32/....." *CONNMARK* module and >>> isn't compiled into the kernel (cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep >>> "CONNMARK") doesn't show me anythink. >>> >>> Can anybody help me please? >>> >>> Thanks >>> > > which pom-ng snapshot are you using? > The last pom-ng snapshot with CONNMARK/TTL/string is from 20050918. > Then these patches were removed, because they are now in 2.6 kernel > serie. But not in 2.4 :/ > -- Samuel Díaz García Director Gerente ArcosCom Wireless, S.L.L. CIF: B11828068 c/ Romero Gago, 19 Arcos de la Frontera 11630 - Cadiz http://www.arcoscom.com mailto:samueldg@arcoscom.com msn: samueldg@arcoscom.com Móvil: 651 93 72 48 Tlfn.: 956 70 13 15 Fax: 956 70 34 83