From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Mac!eKs" <macieks@freesco.pl>
Subject: Re: Where is CONNMARK extension kernel 2.4.32?
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:59:23 +0100
Message-ID: <43C4E50B.2040909@freesco.pl>
References: <43C0F61F.4030400@arcoscom.com> <43C2A451.1020509@arcoscom.com>
	<43C4003B.9080400@freesco.pl> <43C4B1A4.3070706@arcoscom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <43C4B1A4.3070706@arcoscom.com>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

Samuel D=C3=ADaz Garc=C3=ADa napisa=C5=82(a):
> The last pom-ng tested by me where the 20051231 and I'm sure the=20
> CONNMARK isn't into it.

Because in snapshots _newer_ then 20050918 there's no CONNMARK, string, T=
TL.

> Could any netfilter guy re-add these patches into pom-ng for the 2.4=20
> kernels? Or, better, talk with kernel guys to add them into 2.4 mainlin=
e?
>=20
> What do you think about this propose?

I agree :)


--=20
Mac!eKs