All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Wireless: One small step towards a more perfect union...?
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:37:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C58895.4080006@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43C5869A.5080107@gentoo.org>

Daniel Drake wrote:
> FWIW, my opinion is that the devicescape code should be broken down and 
> used to extend the existing stack, no matter how 'good' it is. The way 
> it has been developed (i.e. totally outside of the ieee80211 stack) is 
> somewhat insulting to our development process.

Strongly agreed, though perhaps some of the blame rests on me for 
letting ieee80211 sit around too long without a clear maintainer...

	Jeff



      reply	other threads:[~2006-01-11 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-06  4:22 State of the Union: Wireless Jeff Garzik
2006-01-06 11:31 ` Johannes Berg
2006-01-06 11:46   ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-06 12:26     ` Johannes Berg
2006-01-06 12:48     ` Stefan Rompf
2006-01-06 12:53       ` Johannes Berg
2006-01-07 14:49   ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-10 13:18     ` Johannes Berg
2006-01-10  6:39 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-10  8:36   ` Chase Venters
2006-01-10 10:41   ` [Acx100-devel] " Andreas Mohr
2006-01-10 10:41     ` Andreas Mohr
2006-01-11  2:05 ` Wireless: One small step towards a more perfect union...? John W. Linville
2006-01-11  5:17   ` David S. Miller
2006-01-11  8:37   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-11 13:19   ` Bas Vermeulen
2006-01-11 22:28   ` Daniel Drake
2006-01-11 22:37     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43C58895.4080006@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.