From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bulpin Subject: Re: Ownership of machine pages: Was: Essay on an important Xen decision (long) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:41:00 +0000 Message-ID: <43C694AC.30804@xensource.com> References: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD590320E@cacexc12.americas.cpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD590320E@cacexc12.americas.cpqcorp.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" Cc: xen-devel , "Tian, Kevin" , xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote: > (Sorry again for the late and off-thread reply... even though > your message is addressed to me personally, to xen-devel, > and to xen-ia64-devel, I didn't get a copy and just saw it > in xen-devel which I only receive digested. Some strangeness > in the mailing list nodupe feature maybe? James cc'ed....) If you were on the recipient list of the original mail from Keir then that should have gone directly to you without passing anywhere near the list server, if you didn't get that then it's a problem with mail servers at your or Keir's end. If you've got nodupe set for xen-ia64-devel then your address being on the message means that you won't get the message via the list. You still get the message on the xen-devel digest because nodupe doesn't apply (or make sense) to digests. Cheers, James