From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Subject: Re: conntrack for multiple interfaces Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:48:13 +0100 Message-ID: <43CCD97D.80800@gmx.net> References: <200601161355.22867.kgy@deverto.com> <1137488128.5084.5.camel@bzorp.balabit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kovesdi Gyorgy , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Balazs Scheidler In-Reply-To: <1137488128.5084.5.camel@bzorp.balabit> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Balazs Scheidler schrieb: > On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 13:55 +0100, Kovesdi Gyorgy wrote: > >>My machine has assigned the same IP range for multiple interfaces. Is the >>conntrack able to handle this? > > Conntrack is interface independent, however it does not handle when > tuples collide, it assumes they are part of the same connection. (ie. it > does not work, unless your IP space is actually divided between > interfaces and connections never collide) That's unfortunate. IIRC someone posted a patch to netfilter-devel half a year ago (sorry, no exact date) to address that issue. Was there some reason not to include it back then? The only problem with that patch I can think of right now would be load balancing over multiple links. Regards, Carl-Daniel