From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Giovanni A. Orlando" Subject: A question: May Reiser4 be equivalent to Reiser3 with some flag/plugin ... Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:28:21 +0000 Message-ID: <43CDFC25.90401@futuretg.com> References: <13dbb67f0601070441q559b156ep@mail.gmail.com> <43C2A9D8.80103@namesys.com> <200601092001.17684.marcel@hilzinger.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200601092001.17684.marcel@hilzinger.hu> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hi, Looking the http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz article, I see that in some cases ReiserFS 3.X is better than Reiser4. Correct me if I am wrong. High numbers means poor, more delay. Now, because we plan to support both: Reiser3 and Reiser4 in our OS, we plan to know if there are some system the Reiser3 performance may become available for Reiser4. Reiser4 is superior but seems that with full security enabled logically the system may delay. Basically, my question may be re-posted like: "I know Reiser4 is different than Reiser3, but may the Reiser4 performance may be superior all the time, doing some update? Thanks, Giovanni. -- -- Check FT Websites ... http://www.futuretg.com - ftp://ftp.futuretg.com http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com/Certification http://www.RPMParadaise.org http://www.GiovanniOrlando.com Fixed Europe: +39 0824 314 007. Global Mobile: +39 393 665 4239 (does not work if I am in Caracas). Global Venezuelan Mobile: +58 412 55 41 338. 'Life is ethernal ... and full of sex!' --