From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [10.255.15.25]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k0IBWiQ27014 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:32:44 -0500 Received: from rarr.org.uk (213-228-241-254.dsl.prodigynet.co.uk [213.228.241.254]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0ICW81U032299 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:32:09 -0500 Received: from host217-46-230-193.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.46.230.193] helo=[192.168.0.2]) by rarr.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.54) id 1EzBYF-0006Af-CK for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:32:31 +0000 Message-ID: <43CE271C.4090308@rarr.org.uk> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:31:40 +0000 From: Chris bolton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] Disk space reporting inconsistencies Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hi, just added a new PV to my VG but to me there seems to be an inconsistency between what lvm says is the disk space and what df says. pvscan PV /dev/sda2 VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [68.38 GB / 0 free] PV /dev/sdb VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [68.50 GB / 0 free] PV /dev/hdc2 VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [37.12 GB / 0 free] PV /dev/hdb1 VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [37.22 GB / 0 free] PV /dev/hdd1 VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [37.22 GB / 0 free] PV /dev/hde1 VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [37.25 GB / 0 free] Total: 6 [285.69 GB] / in use: 6 [285.69 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ] df -h /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 265G 227G 28G 90% / I tried resizing the filesystem but it just says this.. ext2online /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 ext2online v1.1.18 - 2001/03/18 for EXT2FS 0.5b ext2online: ext2_ioctl: No space left on device ext2online: unable to resize /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 Am I missing something obvious here? or have I ballsed it up along the way? Cheers, Chris.