From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:57:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Jg555.com ([64.30.195.78]:38066 "EHLO jg555.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S3468145AbWARR4v (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:56:51 +0000 Received: from [172.16.0.55] ([::ffff:172.16.0.55]) (AUTH: PLAIN root, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by jg555.com with esmtp; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:00:28 -0800 id 001D9075.43CE823C.00001980 Message-ID: <43CE821A.6060004@jg555.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:59:54 -0800 From: Jim Gifford User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Atsushi Nemoto CC: ralf@linux-mips.org, tbm@cyrius.com, pdh@colonel-panic.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH Cobalt 1/1] 64-bit fix References: <20060116154543.GA26771@deprecation.cyrius.com> <43CBCAAE.6030403@jg555.com> <20060117135145.GE3336@linux-mips.org> <20060117.232350.93019515.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20060117.232350.93019515.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 9970 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: maillist@jg555.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > But got no response at that time. So I ask again. Could you tell us > how the iomap patch broken verbosely, please? > > How can we get this resolved, this issue has been open a long time. Can we all work together to get a working solution in place that everyone will accept? We all need to understand the concerns with the current method. The only issue I see from Ralf is the following: Broken on multiple PCI busses. Now the way I understand the issue is the current iomap.c only handles a single bus, Ralf's point is that if there are multiple busses this patch may not work properly. Is that a correct statement Ralf. So can't we have one iomap.c for single pci bus systems and one for multiple pci bus systems? Just a thought. -- ---- Jim Gifford maillist@jg555.com