From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030232AbWARSTF (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:19:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030211AbWARSTE (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:19:04 -0500 Received: from fmr18.intel.com ([134.134.136.17]:41352 "EHLO orsfmr003.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030194AbWARSTD (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:19:03 -0500 Message-ID: <43CE8695.9080401@ichips.intel.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:19:01 -0800 From: Sean Hefty User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Dreier CC: Sean Hefty , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roland Dreier wrote: > > + UCMA_MAX_BACKLOG = 128 > > Is there any reason that we might want to make this a tunable? Maybe > as a module parameter that's writable in sysfs... There's no reason not to make this tunable. - Sean From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Hefty Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:19:01 -0800 Message-ID: <43CE8695.9080401@ichips.intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Return-path: To: Roland Dreier In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: openib-general-bounces@openib.org Errors-To: openib-general-bounces@openib.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Roland Dreier wrote: > > + UCMA_MAX_BACKLOG = 128 > > Is there any reason that we might want to make this a tunable? Maybe > as a module parameter that's writable in sysfs... There's no reason not to make this tunable. - Sean