From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <43CE9E81.3000706@cornell.edu> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:01:05 -0700 From: Ivan Gyurdiev MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: Daniel J Walsh , Joshua Brindle , SE Linux Subject: Re: Latest policycoreutils patch References: <43CD54B9.4030307@redhat.com> <43CD9BDE.8010005@tresys.com> <43CDB89C.4030608@redhat.com> <43CDB8DF.9070100@tresys.com> <43CDBA95.8020308@redhat.com> <43CDBB35.6020209@tresys.com> <43CDE7ED.4020908@cornell.edu> <43CE6261.8030204@redhat.com> <43CE824E.6010904@cornell.edu> <43CE8520.5050008@cornell.edu> <1137609022.8926.194.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <43CE8AB3.1070103@cornell.edu> <1137610343.8926.202.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <43CE91FC.7040205@redhat.com> <43CE93E6.8080401@cornell.edu> <43CE94BB.1080302@redhat.com> <1137614340.8926.233.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1137614340.8926.233.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov > Not sure I follow; the patch changes some occurrences of "Failed to add > port" to "Failed to modify port" in the add() method. > ...which is wrong, imho, it should still say "Failed to add port". The second part of it is right, I think (I assume it's changing modify(), hard to tell without the -p flag). There's a bug in modify that says "failed to add" currently. I agree with what Dan is saying, I just think the first place he's changing is wrong. There's another wrong message btw, see interfaces.modify(). -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.