From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <43D0F263.3010109@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:23:31 -0500 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: russell@coker.com.au, Ivan Gyurdiev , SELinux List Subject: Re: [SEMANAGE] Further bugfixes References: <43D0383C.8010404@cornell.edu> <200601202321.07517.russell@coker.com.au> <1137762568.3648.101.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1137762568.3648.101.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 23:20 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > >> >From a patch to the semanage program: >> +semanage fcontext [-admhfrst] CONTEXT_EXPRESSION\n\ >> +semanage interface [-admtr] INTERFACE_NAME\n\ >> semanage login [-admsr] LOGIN_NAME\n\ >> -semanage port [-admtpr] PORT | PORTRANGE\n\ >> +semanage port [-admtpr] PORT | PORT_RANGE\n\ >> >> I think that all of these should be changed similar to my revised man page >> (which I posted under the subject "semanage patch" on the 14th of Jan). >> > > IIRC, that was merged as part of a set of diffs from Dan for > policycoreutils in 1.29.8 on the 18th of January. > > >> I would offer a patch for this, but I think we have enough unmerged patches >> for the semanage utility floating around at the moment. Once we get the >> current patches sorted out I'll be happy to write a patch for this. >> > > Only ones I have queued are one from Joshua yesterday > (libsemanage/semanage - permission check for semanage) and one from Ivan > yesterday ([SEMANAGE] Further bugfixes). > > I have more, but I will wait til you merge what you have. Dan -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.