From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Burns Subject: Re: Speedstep on a Pentium4 630 (2.6.13) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:55:12 +0000 Message-ID: <43D23D40.5080807@adslpipe.co.uk> References: <43CE0D1D.1070808@gmx.at> <43CE3ED9.9070303@adslpipe.co.uk> <43CE5994.9070300@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <43CE5994.9070300@gmx.at> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk celtune-gmx wrote: > i think a cpu with EIST should be scaleable like a Pentium M (my 735 is > with EIST scaleable from 600MHz(0,700V) to 1,7 GHz(1,276V)) Would I get better results with speedstep-ich instead of acpi-cpufreq?