From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Burns Subject: Re: Speedstep on a Pentium4 630 (2.6.13) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:53:00 +0000 Message-ID: <43D3AA5C.6060600@adslpipe.co.uk> References: <43CE0D1D.1070808@gmx.at> <43CE3ED9.9070303@adslpipe.co.uk> <43CE5994.9070300@gmx.at> <43D23CCD.4060808@adslpipe.co.uk> <43D2C0C2.7040900@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <43D2C0C2.7040900@gmx.at> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk cel wrote: > I dont know ,I used on the 630 the module for the Pentium4 (dont know > the exact name now p4clockmod maybe) and ondemand and at idle i had 375MHz Hmm, been trying to read up on EIST, seems that 14x (i.e. 2.8GHz) *is* the slowest clock speed P4 630 will throttle to, which kind of makes it a non-feature on a 3.0GHz CPU. What CPU feature does p4clockmod use to go lower than EIST apparently allows? I'm running rawhide and don't see *p4*.ko did you have to build a custom kernel? I'd like to get idle consumption down on my box to quiet the fans even further ... > and the vcore at about 1,6v (but thats not speedstep!) lm_sensors reckons my Vcore is 1.35v to start with (perhaps I've got my VRM settings wrong in /etc/sensors.conf)