From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <43D6992A.60505@domain.hid>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:16:26 +0100
From: Hannes Mayer <h.mayer@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] wake_up_interruptible ?
References: <43D2B94C.3000202@domain.hid>
	<43D65F27.7000908@domain.hid>	<43D67ECD.5020309@domain.hid>
	<200601242146.35114.berlemont.hauw@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <200601242146.35114.berlemont.hauw@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: General discussion about Adeos <adeos-main.gna.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main>,
	<mailto:adeos-main-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/adeos-main>
List-Post: <mailto:adeos-main@gna.org>
List-Help: <mailto:adeos-main-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main>,
	<mailto:adeos-main-request@domain.hid>
To: Alexis Berlemont <berlemont.hauw@domain.hid>
Cc: adeos-main@gna.org

Alexis Berlemont wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry for the silly things I said earlier, forgot the most important step : 
> the soft irq... 
> 
>> Something like this ?
>>
>> inter_domain_irq = ipipe_alloc_virq();
>> ret = request_irq(inter_domain_irq, linux_handler, SA_INTERRUPT,
>> "virtualIRQ", NULL); enable_irq(inter_domain_irq);
>>
>> void ipipe_handler(unsigned irq) {
>> 	[...]
>> 	ipipe_trigger_irq(inter_domain_irq);
>> 	[...]
>> }
>>
>> void linux_handler(void) {
>> 	wake_up_interruptible(&skeleton_wait);
>> }
> 
> I think you should not use request_irq() but ipipe_virtualize_irq() :
> 
> inter_domain_irq = ipipe_alloc_virq();
> -ret=request_irq(inter_domain_irq,linux_handler,SA_INTERRUPT,"virtualIRQ",NULL); 
> + ret = ipipe_virtualize_irq(ipipe_root_domain, 
> 				inter_domain_irq, 
> 				&ipipe_handler,
> 				NULL, NULL,
> 				IPIPE_HANDLE_MASK);
> -enable_irq(inter_domain_irq);
> 
> Your function linux_handler will be called in the root domain (Linux) any time 
> you use the function ipipe_trigger_irq(...inter_domain_irq...) in a non Linux 
> domain.

Yes, I thought of this too.
I just tried this and it works nicely.
I'm just curious if the wake_up_interruptible in the new ipipe-interrupt handler
(linux_handler in the above snippet) will affect HRT in any other ipipe-int-handler
in the same domain ?

Thank you very much and best regards,
Hannes.