From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "E.Gryaznova" Subject: Re: stale dk warning Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:17:12 +0300 Message-ID: <43D76C48.7060801@namesys.com> References: <1137788919.22212.7.camel@gentoo> <1138004980.6165.11.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> <43D49AFC.3000807@namesys.com> <43D49B4C.5080406@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <43D49B4C.5080406@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Hans Reiser , "Vladimir V. Saveliev" Cc: Alexander Zarochentcev , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello, shouldnt we also remove the warning [nikita-33281] ? Jan 25 14:48:29 bones kernel: <4>reiser4[ent:hda8!(5047)]: capture_anonymous_jno des (fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c:1348)[nikita-33281]: Jan 25 14:48:29 bones kernel: WARNING: anonymous jnode in writeback: (69954 2216 63) Jan 25 14:48:29 bones kernel: Jan 25 14:48:29 bones kernel: <4>reiser4[ent:hda8!(5047)]: capture_anonymous_jno des (fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c:1348)[nikita-33281]: Jan 25 14:48:29 bones kernel: WARNING: anonymous jnode in writeback: (69954 2216 64) Thanks, Lena Hans Reiser wrote: >Hans Reiser wrote: > > > >>Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Hello >>> >>>On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 14:28 -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>In addition to the disable write barrier warning reported by Louis-David >>>>Mitterrand on January 10th, with 2.6.15-1 I'm getting: >>>> >>>> <4>reiser4[dd(25448)]: update_stale_dk (fs/reiser4/search.c:1363)[nikita-38210]: >>>> WARNING: stale dk >>>> >>>>The process varies. I've also seen the stale dk warning triggered by rsync and rm. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>This is harmless. I think we should remove this warning as well as the >>>one about write barrier. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Zam said he would change it >> >> >> >by "it" I refer to the write barrier warning, sorry for my imprecision.... > > > >>to a notice. Zam, what happened to the patch? >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >