From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4,
 unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:14:57 -0800
Message-ID: <43D9D681.7020002@namesys.com>
References: <43D7C6BE.1010804@namesys.com> <43D7CA7F.4010502@namesys.com> <20060126153343.GH4311@suse.de> <43D91225.3030605@namesys.com> <20060126185612.GM4311@suse.de> <43D933EB.6080009@namesys.com> <20060127080625.GS4311@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S932314AbWA0IPA@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060127080625.GS4311@suse.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Edward Shishkin <edward@namesys.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@namesys.com>

Jens Axboe wrote:

> So the systime quoted above is basically useless, it doesn't reflect the
>
>real time spent in the kernel by far. I think you should note that when
>you post these scores, otherwise you're really showing a skewed picture.
>
>  
>
He wasn't expecting me to post the benchmark, and I frankly only looked
at the real time and forgot there was a systime in there that needed
cutting out when I posted it. My error, not his. I must say though, the
real time makes me quite happy, especially considering how CPUs are just
going to keep getting faster.

Best,

Hans