From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
olh@suse.de, balbir@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shrink_dcache_parent() races against shrink_dcache_memory()
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:42:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43DE25F0.6070709@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060130120318.GB9181@hasse.suse.de>
Hello Jan,
this is much cleaner now and looks more like my original patch and is
smaller/more beautifull with counters usage. Thanks.
However, with counters instead of list it is possible to create a live
lock :( So I'm not sure it is really ok.
BTW, what kernel is it for? 2.6.15 or 2.6.16-X?
Kirill
>>1. this patch doesn't fix the whole problem. iput() after sb free is
>>still possible. So busy inodes after umount too.
>>2. it has big problems with locking...
>>
>
>
> Uh yeah! I fixed the second issue but since the patch doesnt helped and only
> gots the reference counting a little bit cleaner I don't post it.
>
>
>>comments below inside.
>>
>
>
> New patch attached below. Comments are welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
> Subject: Fix shrink_dcache_parent() against shrink_dcache_memory() race
> References: 136310
>
> Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> discovered a race between shrink_dcache_parent()
> and shrink_dcache_memory() which leads to "Busy inodes after unmount".
> When unmounting a file system shrink_dcache_parent() is racing against a
> possible shrink_dcache_memory(). This might lead to the situation that
> shrink_dcache_parent() is returning too early. In this situation the
> super_block is destroyed before shrink_dcache_memory() could put the inode.
>
> This patch fixes the problem through introducing a prunes counter which is
> incremented when a dentry is pruned but the corresponding inoded isn't put yet.
> When the prunes counter is not null, shrink_dcache_parent() is waiting and
> restarting its work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
>
> ---
>
> fs/dcache.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/super.c | 4 +++-
> include/linux/fs.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -364,17 +364,21 @@ restart:
> */
> static inline void prune_one_dentry(struct dentry * dentry)
> {
> + struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb;
> struct dentry * parent;
>
> __d_drop(dentry);
> list_del(&dentry->d_u.d_child);
> dentry_stat.nr_dentry--; /* For d_free, below */
> + sb->s_prunes++;
> dentry_iput(dentry);
> parent = dentry->d_parent;
> d_free(dentry);
> if (parent != dentry)
> dput(parent);
> spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> + sb->s_prunes--;
> + wake_up(&sb->s_wait_prunes);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -623,6 +627,34 @@ out:
> return found;
> }
>
> +static int wait_on_prunes(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> + spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> + if (!sb->s_prunes) {
> + spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: waiting for %d prunes\n", __FUNCTION__,
> + sb->s_prunes);
> +
> + while (1) {
> + prepare_to_wait(&sb->s_wait_prunes, &wait,
> + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + if (!sb->s_prunes)
> + break;
> + spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> + schedule();
> + spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> + }
> +
> + finish_wait(&sb->s_wait_prunes, &wait);
> + spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * shrink_dcache_parent - prune dcache
> * @parent: parent of entries to prune
> @@ -634,8 +666,12 @@ void shrink_dcache_parent(struct dentry
> {
> int found;
>
> + again:
> while ((found = select_parent(parent)) != 0)
> prune_dcache(found);
> +
> + if (wait_on_prunes(parent->d_sb))
> + goto again;
> }
>
> /**
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/super.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/super.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/super.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(v
> sema_init(&s->s_dquot.dqio_sem, 1);
> sema_init(&s->s_dquot.dqonoff_sem, 1);
> init_rwsem(&s->s_dquot.dqptr_sem);
> + s->s_prunes = 0;
> + init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_wait_prunes);
> init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_wait_unfrozen);
> s->s_maxbytes = MAX_NON_LFS;
> s->dq_op = sb_dquot_ops;
> @@ -230,8 +232,8 @@ void generic_shutdown_super(struct super
>
> if (root) {
> sb->s_root = NULL;
> - shrink_dcache_parent(root);
> shrink_dcache_anon(&sb->s_anon);
> + shrink_dcache_parent(root);
> dput(root);
> fsync_super(sb);
> lock_super(sb);
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -833,6 +833,9 @@ struct super_block {
> struct list_head s_instances;
> struct quota_info s_dquot; /* Diskquota specific options */
>
> + int s_prunes;
> + wait_queue_head_t s_wait_prunes;
> +
> int s_frozen;
> wait_queue_head_t s_wait_unfrozen;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-30 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-20 20:36 [PATCH] shrink_dcache_parent() races against shrink_dcache_memory() Jan Blunck
2006-01-23 5:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-23 8:12 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-23 15:13 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-23 8:07 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-23 15:57 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-24 5:54 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-24 9:48 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-24 11:10 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-24 17:18 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-25 7:03 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-30 12:03 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-30 14:38 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-30 14:54 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-30 15:02 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-30 15:25 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-30 15:31 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-30 14:42 ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2006-01-30 14:58 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-30 15:59 ` Kirill Korotaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43DE25F0.6070709@sw.ru \
--to=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jblunck@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.