All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@sgi.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: boot-time slowdown for measure_migration_cost
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:43:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43DE7A70.8030004@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060130200026.GA5081@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com>


Tony,

> 
> 
> Might it be wise to see whether the 2% variation that I saw can be
> repeated on some other architecture?   Can someone else try
> this patch and post the before/after values for migration_cost from dmesg?
> 



Ask and ye shall receive ... on the 64p/64G system.

Pristine:

[    9.942253] Brought up 64 CPUs
[    9.942904] Total of 64 processors activated (143654.91 BogoMIPS).
[    9.943995] build_sched_domains: start
[   32.108439] migration_cost=0,32232,39021
[   37.894391] build_sched_domains: end

Patched:

[    0.001307] Calibrating delay loop... 2244.60 BogoMIPS (lpjD89216)
[    9.942308] Brought up 64 CPUs
[    9.942812] Total of 64 processors activated (143654.91 BogoMIPS).
[   18.080441] migration_cost=0,31934,38750
[   23.865993] checking if image is initramfs... it is

P.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@sgi.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: boot-time slowdown for measure_migration_cost
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:43:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43DE7A70.8030004@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060130200026.GA5081@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com>


Tony,

> 
> 
> Might it be wise to see whether the 2% variation that I saw can be
> repeated on some other architecture?   Can someone else try
> this patch and post the before/after values for migration_cost from dmesg?
> 



Ask and ye shall receive ... on the 64p/64G system.

Pristine:

[    9.942253] Brought up 64 CPUs
[    9.942904] Total of 64 processors activated (143654.91 BogoMIPS).
[    9.943995] build_sched_domains: start
[   32.108439] migration_cost=0,32232,39021
[   37.894391] build_sched_domains: end

Patched:

[    0.001307] Calibrating delay loop... 2244.60 BogoMIPS (lpj=4489216)
[    9.942308] Brought up 64 CPUs
[    9.942812] Total of 64 processors activated (143654.91 BogoMIPS).
[   18.080441] migration_cost=0,31934,38750
[   23.865993] checking if image is initramfs... it is

P.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-30 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-27 21:03 boot-time slowdown for measure_migration_cost Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-27 21:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-01-27 21:48 ` Luck, Tony
2006-01-27 21:48   ` Luck, Tony
2006-01-27 22:08   ` Prarit Bhargava
2006-01-27 22:08     ` Prarit Bhargava
2006-01-30 17:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-30 17:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-30 18:53   ` Luck, Tony
2006-01-30 18:53     ` Luck, Tony
2006-01-30 19:24     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-30 19:24       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-30 20:00       ` Luck, Tony
2006-01-30 20:00         ` Luck, Tony
2006-01-30 20:43         ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2006-01-30 20:43           ` Prarit Bhargava
2006-01-30 20:52           ` Prarit Bhargava
2006-01-30 20:52             ` Prarit Bhargava
2006-01-30 20:43     ` John Hawkes
2006-01-30 20:43       ` John Hawkes
2006-01-30 19:26 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-30 19:26   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-01  0:50 ` Chuck Ebbert
2006-02-01  0:50   ` Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43DE7A70.8030004@sgi.com \
    --to=prarit@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.