From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Broken sata (VIA) on Asus A8V (kernel 2.6.14+) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:17:34 +0900 Message-ID: <43E1DC3E.5090007@gmail.com> References: <20060201162800.GA32196@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru> <43E13F57.40808@gmail.com> <20060201231911.GA5463@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru> <43E145B8.6090404@gmail.com> <43E1C6E7.6090506@projecthugo.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.203]:5596 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932453AbWBBKRj (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 05:17:39 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i32so479365wra for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:17:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <43E1C6E7.6090506@projecthugo.co.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: kernel-lists@projecthugo.co.uk Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Matt Darcy wrote: > >> >> Your BMDMA controller is reporting raised interrupt (0x4) and your >> drive is saying that it's ready for the next command, yet interrupt >> handler of sata_via hasn't run and thus the timeout. It looks like >> some kind of IRQ routing problem to me although I have no idea how the >> problem doesn't affect the boot process. >> >> Can you try to boot with boot parameter pci=noacpi? > > > > I have got 2.6.13 - 2.6.14 and 2.6.15 working on the a8v board in both > 32 and 64bit mode. > > Matt > Are you also using dual core processor? It seems like interrupts get lost when routed to one of the processors. Can you post your dmesg? -- tejun