From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <43E313BF.2010104@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:26:39 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] some results on my laptop References: <43E288AA.3050203@domain.hid> <43E28EE8.3020103@domain.hid> <43E2A31D.9000807@domain.hid> <43E30B8D.6030507@domain.hid> <43E31186.1000007@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <43E31186.1000007@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8751AE5944283DAB8CD8DA16" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8751AE5944283DAB8CD8DA16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan Kiszka wrote: > ... > What about other time sources on x86? Which systems already have HPET > these days, and does this source not suffer from frequency scaling? I > once read that HPET is quite easy to program, is this true? IOW, would > it be worth considering to add this to the HAL? There are actually only few registers: http://www.intel.com/hardwaredesign/hpetspec_1.pdf Even a replacement for the TSC is available ("Main Counter"), but I guess that some effort will be required to replace all direct usages of rdtsc in the current Xenomai code, right? Jan --------------enig8751AE5944283DAB8CD8DA16 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD4xO/niDOoMHTA+kRAg4XAJ0Yp2l5Ob9UKUOEu1eJf952jHmJbwCeMb9+ fG2en4OBNZBY77GyWY3ISks= =8Du2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8751AE5944283DAB8CD8DA16--