From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <43E4FAD7.7060804@domain.hid>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:04:55 +0100
From: Hannes Mayer <h.mayer@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper
References: <43E4F63C.4090200@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <43E4F63C.4090200@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

Hi all!

Jan Kiszka wrote:
[...]
> +    printk("Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled in kernel\n"
> +           "         configuration. You may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n");

Speaking of printk. Since 2.1 I don't see any messages in the
kernel log. I bet there is a new switch somewhere, but I
can't find it. Any hint appreciated.

BTW, Jan, the SMI seems to be disabled now, even if I haven't
seen the message of disabling SMI in the klog.

Thanks & best regards,
Hannes.