From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <43E50376.1000205@domain.hid> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:41:42 +0100 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper References: <43E4F63C.4090200@domain.hid> <43E4F739.90204@domain.hid> <43E50233.8020807@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <43E50233.8020807@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai-core Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > >>Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>>Hi Philippe, >>> >>>this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or >>>should we even mention the kconfig path? >>> >> >>The name of the config switch involved should be enough, I guess. > > > What about this? Please apply if it's ok. > Done, thanks. > Jan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Index: ksrc/arch/i386/smi.c > =================================================================== > --- ksrc/arch/i386/smi.c (Revision 539) > +++ ksrc/arch/i386/smi.c (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -209,8 +209,9 @@ > > #else /* ! CONFIG_XENO_HW_SMI_WORKAROUND */ > > - printk("Xenomai: Intel chipset found and SMI workaround not enabled,\n" > - " you may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n"); > + printk("Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled (check\n" > + " CONFIG_XENO_HW_SMI_WORKAROUND). You may encounter high\n" > + " interrupt latencies!\n"); > pci_dev_put(dev); > > #endif /* ! CONFIG_XENO_HW_SMI_WORKAROUND */ -- Philippe.